Hojjat al-Islam Mustafa Dorri, Deputy Director of the Research Institute for Contemporary Jurisprudential Studies:
We Must Distinguish Between Academic Credentials and Seminary’s Value-Based Titles / If We Are to Emulate Universities, It Should Be the World’s Top Universities, Not Those Ranked 300 or 400! / Certification of Ijtihad Should Follow Traditional Methods
The leading and outstanding Seminary/1
Several weeks have passed since the historic message of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution to the conference marking the centennial of the re-establishment of the Qom Seminary, a message that can be regarded as the second “Charter of the Clergy.” One of the key themes of this message was the necessity for the seminary to issue its own independent credentials. In this regard, we spoke with Hojjat al-Islam Mustafa Dorri, Deputy Director of the Research Institute for Contemporary Jurisprudential Studies. In addition to teaching and research, he has been actively involved in curriculum planning for many years and has participated in numerous meetings of the Supreme Council of Seminaries for this purpose. He firmly believes that the need for independent seminary credentials is evident. He argues that those who designed the current four-level credential system for seminaries have essentially imitated universities, whereas it would have been preferable either to avoid such imitation entirely or to model the system after the world’s top universities. According to this Qom Seminary professor and researcher, the pursuit of credentials within the seminary is a product of the market created by seminary management. If no practical significance were attached to seminary credentials internally, students would not pursue them. Below is the detailed and insightful interview conducted by Contemporary Jurisprudence with this professor of both seminary and university:🔻