Contemporary Jurisprudence

Dr. Sadeq qadimi, in an Exclusive Interview with Contemporary Jurisprudence:

Jurisprudence of Governance in Cyberspace/26

Legislation concerning cyberspace has, for several years, become one of the most significant challenges in governance within this domain. On one hand, there are religious individuals who are frustrated with the laxity in this space and demand the enactment of strict laws to curb norm-breakers. On the other hand, some view strict and narrow-minded laws as likely to cause uncontrollable social unrest, making cyberspace even less desirable than its current state.
Dr. Sadeq Qadimi, however, believes that legislation in cyberspace has various dimensions that must all be considered. This researcher and cyberspace activist argues that the notion that all jurisprudential propositions should be converted into law is incorrect.
He considers both the maximalist and minimalist approaches to jurisprudence to have advantages and shortcomings and believes that each should be applied in appropriate contexts.
The full text of the exclusive interview by Contemporary Jurisprudence with this professor and researcher from the Qom Islamic Seminary on cyberspace is as follows:

Jurisprudence of Ethics and Analysis of Inner Acts

According to the news portal of the Research Institute for Contemporary Jurisprudence Studies, the scientific session of this institute, titled “Jurisprudence of Ethics and Analysis of Inner Acts,” was held. The main focus of the discussion was the status of inner and heartfelt acts in jurisprudence and the possibility of applying sharia rulings to them.
🔹 In this session, dedicated to examining the possibility of applying sharia rulings to inner acts such as intellectual and emotional acts, professors from the Islamic seminary, including Hujjat al-Islam Alamzadeh Nouri and Hujjat al-Islam Fazeli Baboli, were present.
🏷 The presenter of the session, emphasizing the voluntary nature of inner acts, introduced examples such as intention, love, and purpose as jurisprudential instances. Additionally, the critiques and questions raised contributed to clarifying the foundations and the need for a more precise examination of this topic. This session represents an important step in advancing studies in the jurisprudence of ethics and addressing contemporary challenges.
View the full text of the news along with the audio of the session: 🔻

Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Dr. Mansour Mirahmadi, in an Exclusive Interview with Contemporary Jurisprudence:

Jurisprudence of International Relations: Nature, Dimensions, and Challenges/5

Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Dr. Mansour Mirahmadi is among the first to have addressed the jurisprudence of international relations. His article titled “The Jurisprudence of International Relations,” written in the early 2010s, was one of the initial steps toward establishing this new branch of jurisprudence.
🔹 We discussed with him the nature and dimensions of the jurisprudence of international relations. He considers international relations neither an interdisciplinary nor an independent discipline but rather a relational discipline. The full text of the exclusive interview by Contemporary Jurisprudence with the professor of the Political Science and International Relations Department at Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran is presented for your consideration: 🔻