The identification of topics for jurisprudential rulings, though as old as the discipline of jurisprudence itself—since understanding a ruling is fundamentally impossible without understanding its topic—has arguably only emerged as a distinct “discourse of topic identification” for just over a decade.
🔹 One of the primary reasons for the emergence of the “discourse of topic identification for jurisprudential rulings” is the increasing proliferation of emerging topics and the difficulty for jurists to comprehensively understand all of them. Below is an index of articles that address the relationship between jurisprudence and topic identification, either generally or in relation to specific jurisprudential topics.
View the full scientific dossier: 🔻