Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Mohammad Taqi Sohrabifar, in an exclusive interview with Contemporary Jurisprudence:
In cases where we do not have certainty about the issuance of a ruling, we must refer to reason
Analysis of Contemporary Jurisprudence Based on a Minimalist Approach to Fiqh/6
Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Mohammad Taghi Sohrabifar is counted among the young advanced jurisprudence and principles professors of the Qom Seminary who also enters emerging jurisprudential issues. Although he does not like the expression of minimal and maximal jurisprudence, with the expression of “necessity of sufficing with certainties in jurisprudence,” he makes evident his advocacy of the minimal approach to jurisprudence.
🏷We spoke with him about the necessities of contemporary jurisprudence based on the minimal approach to jurisprudence. He believes that moving beyond certainties means attributing conjectural and probable rulings to God Almighty, which leads to wasting religion and people’s rights.
The detailed exclusive interview of Contemporary Jurisprudence with this advanced professor of the Qom Seminary is as follows:🔻