Dr. Mehdi Meqdadi Davoodi, in an Exclusive Interview with Contemporary Jurisprudence
The Function of Practical Principles Is Not Solely to Provide an Excuse Before the Lawgiver
Judicial Practical Principles/1
Member of the Scientific Council of the “Judicial and Criminal Jurisprudence” Group at the Institute for Contemporary Jurisprudential Studies Discusses:
Examination of the Conflict Between Principle and Appearance
Judicial Practical Principles/2
Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Dr. Seyed Hassan Vahdati Shabiri, in an Exclusive Interview with Contemporary Fiqh:
Fiqh and Civil Law Have No Exclusive Practical Principles!
Judicial Practical Principles/3
Ali Mohammad Hakimian
Istishab Has No Application in Judicial Practice!
Judicial Practical Principles/5
Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Ebrahim Baqeri
The Inapplicability of Practical Principles in Proving a Crime
Judicial Practical Principles/6
Faculty Member of the Jurisprudence and Criminal Law Department at Jami‘at al-Mustafa, in an Exclusive Interview with Contemporary Jurisprudence:
We Do Not Have Exclusive Practical Principles for Judicial Jurisprudence
Judicial Practical Principles/7
Adjudication in courts often relies on practical principles due to the absence of evidence, doubling their importance in judicial jurisprudence. We discussed the nature and various dimensions of judicial practical principles with Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Akbar Khadim al-Zakirin, faculty member of the Jurisprudence and Criminal Law Department at Jami‘at al-Mustafa. He does not consider judicial jurisprudence to possess exclusive practical principles distinct from the general practical principles of the science of jurisprudence. In his view, the evidence establishing the authoritativeness of practical principles also proves their authoritativeness in judicial jurisprudence. The full text of Contemporary Jurisprudence’s exclusive interview with this professor of advanced jurisprudence and principles at Qom Seminary is presented below: