Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Mohammad Bidar, born in 1979 in Moghan, is a faculty member of the Economics Department at the Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute. He is considered one of the young professors of Islamic economics who has …
Note Professor Hassan Nazari Shahroudi has specialized in economic jurisprudence and Islamic economics for many years. Born in 1949 in Shahroud, in addition to teaching various courses on Islamic economics, he has authored numerous books and articles in this field. …
Note Economic jurisprudence is a concept that is both simple and complex (Ar. sahl wa mumtaniʿ); simple, because its various topics have been discussed in jurisprudential books for centuries; and complex, because so many new topics and approaches have emerged …
Note Economic jurisprudence, by virtue of its extensive presence in society and among people, is one of the largest, most far-reaching, and most influential chapters of contemporary jurisprudence. Although issues within this jurisprudential chapter have been discussed in the jurisprudential …
Note Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Sayyid Mohammad Kazim Rajaei Ramsheh was born in 1960 in Semirom, Isfahan. After completing his middle school education, he entered the religious seminary (Hawza) of Shahreza and moved to Qom in 1976. Upon entering the …
“Our Economics” is one of the invaluable works of Martyr Sadr, which he authored in response to the pressing needs of the Islamic society and as a rejoinder to the intellectual onslaught of Western and Eastern civilizations on the Islamic world. This work has been translated into Persian in two volumes by Mr. Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Borhani and published by Dar al-Sadr Publications. The present writing endeavors to provide a content-based report of the first volume of this work.
Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Mohammad Bidar Parchin Olya is one of the young professors of economic jurisprudence in the Qom seminary. Having received his doctorate in Islamic economics, in addition to authoring several books and dozens of articles, he has also supervised over 20 doctoral and master’s theses related to economics. A faculty member of the Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, in an exclusive note for Contemporary Jurisprudence, he has expounded upon the foundations and presuppositions of economic jurisprudence. He believes that with a minimalist approach to the science of jurisprudence, neither Islamic economics nor economic jurisprudence will advance.
Hojjat al-Islam Mohammad Bidar Parchin Alia, a young scholar of Islamic economic jurisprudence at the Qom Seminary, holds a Ph.D. in Islamic economics. In addition to authoring several books and dozens of articles, he has supervised over 20 doctoral and master’s theses related to economics. As a faculty member of the Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute, he has contributed an exclusive note to Contemporary Jurisprudence, outlining the principles and premises of economic jurisprudence. He argues that a minimalist approach to jurisprudential knowledge hinders the progress of both Islamic economics and its jurisprudence.
Dr. Abbas Shafieinejad, born in 1976, holds both a Level 4 seminary degree in economics and a university Ph.D. in money and banking. As a member of the board of the Islamic Economics Association of the Qom Seminary and the head of the Economic eaves this field.
It is surprising that some prominent jurists, such as Sheikh Morteza Ansari, began their Makasib with the hadith on the division of earnings, known as the Tahf al-Uqul hadith, along with a few other weak hadiths, while refraining from presenting a general discussion on Quranic verses that are widely accepted and used in numerous instances. This is particularly notable given that the Tahf al-Uqul hadith is mursal (lacking a complete chain of narrators), inconsistent, narrated by meaning, and some of its segments are disregarded by scholars. Moreover, this hadith resembles a jurisprudential text more than a direct narration from an infallible source. Other narrations cited share a similar status to the Tahf al-Uqul hadith. It would have been more appropriate for Sheikh Ansari and other Imami jurists to begin their discussions on the rulings of transactions with a comprehensive reference to these widely accepted sources to achieve the intended objectives.