In the sixty-second session of “Method on Sundays,” Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Dr. Morteza Fayyaz, emphasizing the theoretical gap in law interpretation, raised the necessity of compiling independent and coherent principles and critiqued the unprincipled application of the principles of jurisprudence to legal texts. By introducing the three main schools of law interpretation, he emphasized the differences between human and divine legislators.
🔹 In this session, Dr. Fayyaz examined the possibility and scope of using the rules of the principles of jurisprudence in the process of interpreting secular laws and sought to demonstrate that in some cases, this application may lead to errors in understanding the law.
🏷 Hujjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Arasta, as the critic, pointed to the breadth of the concept of law interpretation and emphasized the need to revisit key concepts including ambiguity, vagueness, removing restrictions, conflict, and resolving silence. This session represents an important step toward enhancing scientific understanding and a more precise methodology for law interpretation in Iran.
View the full text along with the audio of the session: 🔻